| Minnesota: #1 in education... but why? |
|
ALEC's large analysis is statistically based on externally available data such as standardized scores, and available online (pdf) in detail, and I see no reason not to accept their results and conclusions. I'm inserting my own disclaimer here: even though, in the article title, I said, for brevity, that Minnesota is #1 in education. These results are based on standardized test scores, which are a questionable measure of "education" in the broad sense. Nevertheless, these results do contain information of importance. The Bad News
A little improvement
It may be impossible to fairly compare one state's student performance against another. Minnesota, for example, has a high median income, and lots of technical industry, both of which tend to cause education to be emphasized among residents. What the ALEC study looks for is not so much which states are doing well or poorly, but to try to find controllable causes that might explain better or poorer results. Spending more does not help Per pupil expenditures have increased a dramatic 53.5 percent in constant dollars - from $4,924 in 1981-82 to $7,557 in 2001-02. The number of public school students increased just 18.3% over that period. Again, that ALEC result is emphatically repeated... that spending more money doesn't help... there appears to be no connection between changes in SAT scores over the past two decades and increases or decreases in educational inputs such as expenditures per pupil. This study deflates the most common demands made on taxpayers by education officials. Smaller class sizes and higher teacher pay do not seem to affect results. What DOES help? You have to look hard in this report to find causes that clearly produce better results, and they're not strong correlations: higher student achievement is weakly associated with MORE pupils per teacher, LESS federal involvement, and smaller schools. Not proof, but suspicious coincidence... Here are the 6 states that received the highest proportion of their educational funds from the feds: 1. Mississippi 15.3% and ranks 50th in performance The Manhattan Institute Center for Civic Innovation computes an Educational Freedom Index, based on how free residents are to choose educational alternatives. It takes into account voucher programs, home schooling freedom, charter schools, and being able to choose among districts. Minnesota and Wisconsin, rated 1 and 2 based on test scores, are rated 5th and 6th best in terms of educational freedom. Again... not proof, but hard to ignore. The ALEC study expresses the opinion that educational results are improved by better teachers. I suspect that the personal experience of most of us verifies that... many of us have stories about one or two teachers who had a very positive effect on our school experience. Teachers become better with experience, and they have better results if they're allowed to teach using the methods they've learned work best. Students learn when good teachers make learning fun. My input from some excellent, award-winning teachers over the years has been that schools have become more rigid, more bureaucratic, and that imposed state and federal programs have taken a lot of classroom control from teachers. Campaigns to reduce class size have resulted in having to hire more teachers... younger, less-experienced, lower-paid teachers. That's not a criticism of younger teachers, but experience, once laboriously gained, should not be sacrificed, especially to elitist programs generated by "experts" in quasi-political state and federal educational offices. Here is the complete ranking of states based on educational achievement: Minnesota 1 |
| # -- Posted 11/18/04; 12:03:31 AM Edit |